|
Historical
Review
of
Tekhelet
& the Hillazon
Prepared by Mois A. Navon |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
1750 BCE
|
|
|||||||||
|
Crete (1750 BCE) – The archaeological evidence now
available suggests that the origins of the purple and blue dye industry can
be traced to Crete. |
||||||||||
1500 BCE
|
|
||||||||||
|
Tell-el-Amarna Tablets (1500-1300 BCE) – The phrase subatu sa
takilti - a garment of tekhelet - is listed as one of the precious
articles sent to Egypt by Dusratta, King of the Mittani, as dowry to the
Egyptian prince who was about to marry his daughter. |
||||||||||
|
Exodus (1312 BCE) – Jews leave Egypt. |
||||||||||
1300 BCE
|
![]() |
||||||||||
|
Yehoshua (1272
BCE) – Conquest of Canaan. |
||||||||||
|
1200 BCE
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Tel Shikmona Vat (circa 1200 BCE) – Chemical analysis of dye stains on an ancient vat are found to be
molecularly equivalent to dye from Murex snails. |
|||||||||
|
|
Canaanite Coast (1200-900 BCE) – The
vat from Tel Shikmona, together with various other archaeological finds at
numerous sites (shown at left), reveals an advanced dye industry using Murex
snails established on the Canaanite coast. |
|||||||||
|
600 BCE
|
|
|||||||||
|
Destruction of Temple (586
BCE) – Babylonian Exile. |
||||||||||
100 BCE
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Dye Use Restrictions (100 BCE - 68 CE) – Caesar (100-44 BCE) and
Augustus (63 BCE -14 CE) restricted the use of the dyes to governing
classes. Nero (37-68 CE) issued
a decree that gave the emperor exclusive right to wear purple or blue
garments. |
|||||||||
|
300 CE
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Dye Imperialization (337-383) – Under Constantius (337-362) the
restrictions against the use of tekhelet were strictly enforced. An
edict (383) by Gratian, Valentinian, and Theodosius made the manufacture of
higher quality purple and blue a state monopoly. |
|||||||||
500 CE
|
|
||||||||||
|
The Talmud (circa 550) – The Talmud tells of tekhelet
being brought from Israel to Babylon in the days of R. Ahai (506) – the last
positive indication of the use of tekhelet. One can assume that tekhelet
was available until the redaction of the Talmud, as no reference to its
discontinuance is recorded. |
||||||||||
|
639 CE
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Demise of Dye Industry (639) – The Arab conquest of Israel is believed
to have brought an end to the snail source dyeing industry in Israel. |
|||||||||
|
750 CE
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Negative Mention (750-760) – The Midrash Tanhuma (750) laments
“and now we have no tekhelet, only white.” In the halakhic work Sheiltot d’Rav Ahai
(760) there is no mention of tekhelet. |
|||||||||
|
1500
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Early Research in Mollusk-based Dyes (1500-1685) – Guillaum Rondelet (d. 1566) was
the first to identify Pliny’s purpura with the species Murex
brandaris. Fabius Columna
(1616) suggests Murex trunculus as having been utilized in the ancient
dyeing process. William Cole
(1681) noted that a colorless fluid in the hypobranchial gland of marine
mollusks (Purpura lapillus) found off the coast of Britain was
converted to a red color on exposure to light, thus revealing the sensitivity
of mollusk-based dye to light. |
|
|||||||||
|
1857
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Discovery of Dye Snails – French zoologist Henri de Lacaze -Duthiers
discovered three dye-producing snails in the Mediterranean: Murex
brandaris, Murex trunculus and Thais haemastoma (pictured: left to
right). |
|||||||||
|
1864
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Discovery of Dye Industry – At Sidon, massive mounds (hundreds of yards
long and several yards deep) of Murex trunculus snails were
found. The shells were broken in
the spot that gives access to the glands from which the dyestuff is
obtained. At some distance, a
separate and distinct massive mound of Murex brandaris and Thais
haemastoma was found. Since
a reddish-purple dye is most readily obtainable from the Murex brandaris and
Thais haemastoma as opposed to the bluish-purple obtained from the
Murex trunculus, Egyptologist A. Dedekind (1898) viewed this fact as
undeniable proof that Murex trunculus was the snail used exclusively
for tekhelet (blue), and the others for argaman (purple); Rav
Herzog concurred. |
|||||||||
1888
|
|
||||||||||
|
Radzyner Rebbi (Rabbi Gershon Hanoch Leiner) –- Pioneered a quest for tekhelet which
led to the isolation of a certain type of squid (Sepia officinalis) as
its source. Subsequent chemical
analysis identified the dye as Prussian blue, the color of which derives from
added chemicals and not from the squid itself. This is something the Rebbi himself would not have
countenanced, as he writes: the color must be exclusively from the hillazon. The Rebbi’s three books on the subject
(Sfunei Temunei Chol, Ptil Tekhelet, Ein HaTekhelet) still serve as a
basis for halakhic investigation. |
||||||||||
1909
|
|
||||||||||
|
Discovery of Dibromoindigo –
German chemist Paul Friedlander identified the chemical structure of the purple
dye from the Murex snail as being 6,6’-dibromoindigo. |
||||||||||
1913
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Rabbinical Investigation – R. Isaac Herzog’s doctoral thesis on tekhelet
named the Murex trunculus as the “most likely candidate” for the
source of tekhelet – except that, by using contemporary dyeing
procedures, its dye was not pure blue. |
|||||||||
|
1980
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Discovery of Process to Obtain Blue
Dye – Prof. Otto Elsner of the Shenkar
College of Fibers in Israel discovered the secret of producing a pure blue
color from the Murex trunculus snail, thus solving Herzog’s most
compelling difficulty. Together with Ehud Spanier of Haifa University, he
investigated the photo-chemical properties of the trunculus dye and
found that when the dye is in a reduced state (a prerequisite for dyeing
wool), exposure to ultra-violet light will transform the blue-purple colorant
(dibromoindigo) to unadulterated blue (indigo). |
|||||||||
|
1985
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Rabbi Eliyahu Tavger – While
writing his book (K’lil Tekhelet) about tzitzit, R. Tavger became convinced that the
source of authentic tekhelet had been in fact discovered. Determined to actualize his newfound
knowledge, and after much trial and error, he succeeded in applying the
process according to the halakha from beginning to end – thus becoming
the first person since its loss to dye tekhelet for the ritual purpose
of tzitzit. |
|||||||||
|
1993
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
P’til Tekhelet – Together with R. Tavger, the P’til Tekhelet
organization was formed to produce and distribute tekhelet strings, as
well as to promote research and educational projects. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Sources: R. Isaac Herzog, The Royal Purple and The
Biblical Blue, Keter, 1987. Dr. Baruch Sterman, The Science of Tekhelet,
Tekhelet: Renaissance of a Mitzvah, YU Press, 1996. Dr. Yisrael Ziderman, Reinstitution of the
Mitzvah of Tekhelet in Tzitzit, Techumin, Vol. 9. |
|||||||||||
www.tekhelet.com
In Memory of Avi Guberman, z”l
mois@tekhelet.com |
|||||||||||